Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

FBI investigate peace activist

By Paul Woodward on June 11, 2010

At a recent protest in San Francisco, Zionists hurled insults at peace activists and also issued threats such as this:

You’re all being identified, every last one of you…we will find out where you live. We’re going to make your lives difficult..we will disrupt your families…

It would appear that there are Zionists in Austin, Texas, who share the same sentiment and have decided to enlist the services of the FBI in order to pursue their political agenda.

What other plausible explanation can there be as to why the FBI came to question the mother of five shown in this video? She is a part-time registered nurse and part-time peace activist whose only form of “suspicious” behavior is that she has participated in protests calling for justice in Palestine.


Aletho News adds:

Israel is (as usual) taking revenge on the Palestinian relatives of activists onboard. Those who seek to non violently oppose Zionist policies of Apartheid violence are having loved ones interrogated by the Shabak. – Link

June 11, 2010 - Posted by | Civil Liberties, Solidarity and Activism, Timeless or most popular, Video

10 Comments »

  1. “Pleading silence is a 1st amendment right”?

    Its a 5TH AMENDMENT right and it’s not a “plea”

    Comment by Varant | June 11, 2010 | Reply

    • Don’t sweat the little stuff.

      Comment by Jim | June 11, 2010 | Reply

  2. LOL they did the same thing to me in early part of 2001, the purpose of the FBI visit is to intimidate nothing more or less!
    FBI IS NUMBER ONE TERRORIST ON EARTH!

    YES FREE PALESTINE YOU SCUMBAG ZIONIST AMERIKKKANS.

    Comment by Falesteeni | June 11, 2010 | Reply

  3. [...] FBI investigate peace activist by thewhaler on June 11, 2010 http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/fbi-investigate-peace-activist/ [...]

    Pingback by FBI investigate peace activist « Whaler News | June 11, 2010 | Reply

  4. The F.B.I. (F*cking Bas*ards of Israel) have been part of the Rothschilds enforcement arm on U.S. soil for as long as it’s existed. The evidence that shows that F.B.I. involvement in Sept. 11, 2001, is ‘overwhelming’ to say the least, and it continues today in their total disregard for the U.S. Constitution as they illegally spy on people who demand the truth be told, and they continue to cover up the extreme criminality of the Executive Branch as if they all were trained at K.G.B. Headquarters in Moscow. If you want to know the truth, the F.B.I. has been a criminal ZIONIST enforcer of the Rothschilds for so many years, that virtually every investigation it has touched has been a huge, irrefutable WHITEWASH of the facts.

    So, it doesn’t surprise me even a little bit that they are now targeting citizens who participate in ANTI ZIONIST activities, no matter how peaceful they are.

    Oh, by the way, Eric Holder and the rest of you, WE KNOW WHERE YOU ALL LIVE, too! Our lists are very very very comprehensive, and someday, they’ll be used to round you all up and ship you to a camp of your own you won’t like any more than any of us like having our FREEDOM SUPPRESSED BY SCUM LIKE YOU ARE!!!

    just keep it up! You’ll find you’re all not going to like the results of this repression and monstrously illegal behavior you continue to do every day of your slimy existence.

    what goes around, does indeed, come around.

    Comment by NON-ZIONISTS CAN PLAY THAT GAME AS WELL | June 11, 2010 | Reply

  5. I was harassed online by the FBI in Austin (cyberstalking) when my employer found out I was going to pro-Palestinian protests. That employer was Cycorp, a defense contractor.

    Comment by sd | June 11, 2010 | Reply

  6. Dear woman,you sure as hell have “big ovaries”!
    I always knew that the ADL and AIPAC have an inordinate amount of influence(all negative for US citizens),but I didn’t know that their tactics of intimidation have now extended to coercing the FBI to intimidate citizens who protest against our sickening,warmongering Israeli centered policies.

    What frightens & angers me the most is that the members of same “tribe” in our congress are the biggest cheerleaders in advancing the cause of disarming American citizens.
    When you contemplate the dual agenda of upcoming “hate speech” laws being pushed by Abe Foxman of the ADL and the inevitable disarmament of citizens,you are left with something not very far from what those in the Soviet Union experienced.
    It’s ironic that the same group used similar tactics at that time,but don’t expect to see that in school textbooks.

    Since you’re an RN,my guess is that you’re no fan of guns,but I can assure you that without them,we are vulnerable to the worst imaginable abuses by our government if it should continue on this course dictated by a very clever element that has hijacked it for its own agenda.

    Thank you for the video,it will open many eyes.

    Comment by Dave | June 11, 2010 | Reply

  7. [...] ayant pris part à la flottille humanitaire dans les eaux internationales. Elles nous donne ici un cours d’autodéfense contre ces pratiques [...]

    Pingback by Korbo Info » Impôts-pulaires | June 12, 2010 | Reply

  8. Don’t Think For A Moment—You Can Talk To The FBI Off The Record.

    If you are questioned by the FBI and truthfully answer “No” to a question, you might be charged for making a false statement under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. For example, if someone (unbeknownst to you) had proposed committing an act of violence or other crime at an activist meeting you attended—then later the FBI questions you about having knowledge of that proposal, by answering “No” the FBI might charge you for providing a misleading answer or lying to a federal agent under18 U.S.C. § 1001. This law is a trap for the innocent, because how can you prove you didn’t know something? Even answering, “yes” under this law can be hazardous. Consider the U.S. Supreme Case BROGAN v. UNITED STATES No. 96—1579. Argued December 2, 1997 Decided January 26, 1998: James Brogan was indicted on federal bribery charges and for making a “false statement” within the jurisdiction of a (federal agency) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Note under the law, that any person questioned by the FBI or other Federal Agency can be imprisoned up to 5-years and fined $10,000 for every “misleading or false answer”; that includes false or misleading statements made to the FBI when questioned about a crime the Government can’t prove you committed. Under BROGAN v. UNITED STATES, Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg noted that when the FBI questions someone about an old crime after the Statute of Limitations past for criminal prosecution, and the questioned person denies having committed the crime, their fresh denial may involuntarily waive their right to assert in their defense—the statute of limitations has past for criminal prosecution e.g., a 20-year old crime. Consequently if you are ever questioned by the FBI or other federal agency about a past crime or about having knowledge of anything illegal happening in the future, the smart thing to do might be to remain silent and if necessary state to the FBI “Before I answer any of your questions I first need the benefit of an attorney.” Keep in mind that there is no such thing as talking to an FBI Agent or any federal agency off the record. Re: James Brogan, the FBI came by Brogan’s office and gave the appearance their visit was informal, then after asking a few questions indicted Brogan for lying to the FBI.
    Below is a brief summary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision BROGAN v. UNITED STATES No. 96—1579 and Website access to learn more about the Brogan Case and 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
    BROGAN v. UNITED STATES
    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
    No. 96—1579. Argued December 2, 1997–Decided January 26, 1998
    Petitioner falsely answered “no” when federal agents asked him whether he had received any cash or gifts from a company whose employees were represented by the union in which he was an officer. He was indicted on federal bribery charges and for making a false statement within the jurisdiction of a federal agency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. A jury in the District Court found him guilty. The Second Circuit affirmed, categorically rejecting his request to adopt the so-called “exculpatory no” doctrine, which excludes from §1001’s scope false statements that consist of the mere denial of wrongdoing.
    Held: There is no exception to §1001 criminal liability for a false statement consisting merely of an “exculpatory no.” Although many Court of Appeals decisions have embraced the “exculpatory no” doctrine, it is not supported by §1001’s plain language. By its terms, §1001 covers “any” false statement–that is, a false statement “of whatever kind,” United States v. Gonzales, 520 U.S. ___, ___–including the use of the word “no” in response to a question. Petitioner’s argument that §1001 does not criminalize simple denials of guilt proceeds from two mistaken premises: that the statute criminalizes only those statements that “pervert governmental functions,” and that simple denials of guilt do not do so. United States v. Gilliland, 312 U.S. 86, 93, distinguished. His argument that a literal reading of §1001 violates the “spirit” of the Fifth Amendment is rejected because the Fifth Amendment does not confer a privilege to lie. E.g., United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 117. His final argument that the “exculpatory no” doctrine is necessary to eliminate the grave risk that §1001 will be abused by overzealous prosecutors seeking to “pile on” offenses is not supported by the evidence and should, in any event, be addressed to Congress. Pp. 2—8.
    96 F.3d 35, affirmed.

    Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and O’Connor, Kennedy, and Thomas, JJ., joined, and in which Souter, J., joined in part. Souter, J., filed a statement concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
    Ginsburg, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Souter, J., joined. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, J., joined.
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/96-1579.ZS.html

    Comment by Ross Wolf | June 13, 2010 | Reply

  9. I have absolutely NO respect for the FBI today. They are sock puppets for the Zionists and are a disgrace to AMerican freedoms and principles. 50 years ago I applied to the FBI academy as our next door neighbor was the the AIC of the Tampa FBI and obviously I admired them. Today they are so much mindless soulless – as are the sociopathic war criminal murderers in our sick Godless twisted military.

    I am also an ex Green Beret paratroop commander before 90% of you readers were born – and will tell you with NO reservation what so ever that the last thing on earth I would want- is for one of my sons to be involved with our modern improved ‘Army terrorists strong’ Jew run war criminal mercinary military!

    May God bless that courageous woman who stood up to those two sleazy Zionist ‘FBI JTTF’ scumbags who insulted our freedoms and disgraced our Constitution by their act of terrorism in trying to frighten an American citizen from exercising our GOD GIVEN RIGHT to self expression against a monstrous evil. Their putrid unconscionable conduct has NO place in this country!

    I put my life on the line some 2 generations ago to ensure that NO deceny American citizen would EVER have to be bullied and terrified and humiliated in their own homes by home grown ‘polite’ Gestapo!

    And unless you punks in the peanut gallery have also witnessed a Jew soldier murder a terrified 5 year old child in Gaza just for hatred and sadism – using MY TAX DOLLARS – just keep your filthy mouths shut!

    Joe Cortina

    Comment by Joe Cortina | June 30, 2010 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

« Previous | Next »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 219 other followers