Carbonphobia, the real environmental threat
Written by Atheo – Aletho News – December 19, 2009
(photo credit – Bloomberg)
The proposed construction of a new generation of nuclear plants is just one aspect of the environmental threat posed by cap and trade or carbon taxes. This report addresses yet another threat, biomass energy generation. Wood chips and wood pellets are exempt from European Union permit rules for carbon emissions, ostensibly because the chipped trees recently absorbed carbon from the atmosphere. The fact that the trees would have sequestered the carbon for centuries if left as living natural habitat and soil regenerative decomposing matter is conveniently overlooked.
Energy legislation in the U.S. has yet to be passed, but current bills similarly promote the wholesale clearing of forests for combustion. Bloomberg describes it as energy sprawl:
More forests, deserts and grasslands in the U.S. will be used to produce energy under a proposal to cap greenhouse gases, an unintended consequence of efforts to fight global warming, according to a Nature Conservancy report.
A bill that boosts energy from wind turbines and biofuels will increase the amount of land needed for energy development as much as 48 percent, or almost 100,000 square kilometers (38,600 square miles) during the next 20 years, said Robert McDonald, a scientist with the Arlington, Virginia-based Nature Conservancy environmental group.
America’s publicly owned national forests will be made available for this new private industry if Obama appointee Tom Tidwell, Director of the U.S. Forest Service, gets his way. Biomass electric power generating plants can consume as much as one semi-trailer truck load of chipped forest every ten minutes. While harvesters may be required to re-plant the stripped landscapes they leave behind, it should be remembered that mono-crop plantation forests are not ecosystems and also that massive quantities of herbicides are needed to prevent weeds from overtaking the seedlings.
The health of surrounding communities is put in jeopardy as well. In a position paper called Biomass Position Statement, the American Lung Association of New England outlines the concerns: “Biomass emissions contain fine particulate matter, sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, and various irritant gases such as nitrogen oxides that can scar the lungs. Like cigarettes, biomass emissions also contain chemicals that are known or suspected to be carcinogens, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and dioxin.”
Extraordinary conjecture is utilized to rationalize the removal of our forests:
“… many of our Western forests are at risk of turning from a carbon sink to a carbon source,” Tom Tidwell, the head of the Forest Service, told a Senate subcommittee on Nov. 18 in a hearing on forest management and climate change.
“Projections indicate that while these forests continue to sequester more carbon in the short-term, in 30 to 50 years, disturbances such as fire and insects and disease could dramatically change the role of forests, thereby emitting more carbon than currently sequestering.”
So on the one hand, the scientific community considers forests to be carbon sinks, and, when convenient, forests are presented as a carbon threat by government officials.
Professors at Oregon State University are unconvinced, and suggest that clearing forests for biofuel could potentially release more carbon through transport and processing than if the material simply burned in the woods.
Portland’s Oregonian presents further ‘carbon sequestration’ rationalizations for logging our forests:
Sen. John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, said to maximize carbon capture, forests should be logged and turned into lumber, which would store the carbon in the form of two-by-fours and other long-lived wood products.
The Wyoming senator’s view is supported by analysis done by Elaine Oneil at the University of Washington’s forestry school.
Oneil said more carbon is released into the atmosphere by producing wood alternatives like concrete and steel, outweighing the carbon benefit of leaving forests standing. “The best thing to do, in terms of a carbon benefit, is to manage these forests on fairly rapid rotations,” Oneil said of Oregon’s wet, west-side forests… cut more often and plant fast-growing young forests.
All of this was anticipated by Jeffrey St. Clair last summer upon Tidwell’s appointment by President Obama. As Regional Forester for the Northern Rockies Tidwell had a 32 year track record as a “facilitator of forest destruction“. In the excerpt below St. Clair describes Tidwell’s priorities:
During his tenure in Montana, Tidwell specialized in the art of coercive collaboration, a social manipulation technique that involves getting environmental groups to endorse destructive projects they would normally litigate to stop. Yet, when copiously lubricated with the magic words “collaboration” or “climate change” most environmentalists can be enticed to swallow even the most ghastly of clearcuts in the most ecologically sensitive sites, such as the Bitterroot Mountains in Montana to the fast-dwindling ponderosa pine forests of Oregon’s Blue Mountains.
One of Tidwell’s highest priorities will, it seems, be to turn the national forests into industrial biomass farms, all in the name of green energy. Under this destructive scheme, forests, young and old alike, will be clearcut, not for lumber, but as fuel to be burned in biomass power generators. Already officials in the big timber states of Oregon and Washington are crowing that they will soon be able to become the “Saudi Arabia” of biomass production. Did they run this past Smokey the Bear?
Of course, Smokey, that global icon of wildfire suppression, and Tidwell will, no doubt, find common ground on another ecologically dubious project: thinning and post-fire salvage logging. We’ve reached the point where old-fashioned timber sales are a thing of the past. Now every logging operation will an ecological justification — specious though they all certainly turn out to be.
The Alliance for the Wild Rockies, one of the few green outfits to consistently stand up against Democratic Party-sponsored depredations on the environment, sued Tidwell at least 20 times during his time as regional forester in Missoula. There’s no record of Tidwell being sued even once by Boise-Cascade, Plum Creek Timber or the Noranda Gold Mining Company.
Yet by and large, the mainstream environmental movement has muzzled itself while the Obama administration stocks the Interior Department with corporate lawyers, extraction-minded bureaucrats and Clinton-era retreads.
Update – Copenhagen framework:
Corporate lobbyists can pressure or bribe governments to rig the system in their favour
Johann Hari – The Independent – December 11, 2009
The first week of this summit is being dominated by the representatives of the rich countries trying to lace the deal with Enron-style accounting tricks that will give the impression of cuts, without the reality. It’s essential to understand these shenanigans this week, so we can understand the reality of the deal that will be announced with great razzmatazz next week …
A study by Stanford University found that most of the projects that are being funded as “cuts” either don’t exist, don’t work, or would have happened anyway. Yet this isn’t a small side-dish to the deal: it’s the main course …
Canadian, Swedish and Finnish logging companies have successfully pressured their governments into inserting an absurd clause into the rules. The new rules say you can, in the name of “sustainable forest management”, cut down almost all the trees – without losing credits. It’s Kafkaesque: a felled forest doesn’t increase your official emissions… even though it increases your actual emissions.
###
Also by Atheo:
January 9, 2012
Three Mile Island, Global Warming and the CIA
November 13, 2011
US forces to fight Boko Haram in Nigeria
September 19, 2011
Bush regime retread, Philip Zelikow, appointed to Obama’s Intelligence Advisory Board
March 8, 2011
Investment bankers salivate over North Africa
January 2, 2011
Top Israel Lobby Senator Proposes Permanent US Air Bases For Afghanistan
October 10, 2010
A huge setback for, if not the end of, the American nuclear renaissance
July 5, 2010
Progressive ‘Green’ Counterinsurgency
February 25, 2010
Look out for the nuclear bomb coming with your electric bill
February 7, 2010
The saturated fat scam: What’s the real story?
January 5, 2010 – Updated February 16, 2010:
Biodiesel flickers out leaving investors burned
December 26, 2009
Mining the soil: Biomass, the unsustainable energy source
December 4, 2009
There’s more to climate fraud than just tax hikes
May 9, 2009
Obama, Starving Africans and the Israel Lobby
Share this:
Related
December 11, 2009 - Posted by aletho | Author: Atheo, Deception, Environmentalism, Science and Pseudo-Science | European Union, Jeffrey St. Clair, John Barrasso, Oregon State University, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, United States, United States Forest Service
10 Comments »
Leave a comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Featured Video
Hunter Got High
or go to
Aletho News Archives – Video-Images
From the Archives
Critiquing Israel: Colonialism or Jewish culture?
Fighting the enemy at times means fighting your erstwhile comrades-in-arms
By Eric Walberg | April 5, 2012
The phenomenal success the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement has had since it began in 2005 has attracted attention from all corners of the political spectrum — for better or for worse. Israel is scared. Israeli thinktanks have described BDS as a greater threat to Israel than armed Palestinian resistance. At the same time, at the forefront of the movement against what is now widely called Israeli apartheid are Jews — Israeli and diaspora. This is not surprising, as Jews have traditionally been active in “political mobilisation and opinion formation”, according to Benjamin Ginsberg.
So it should not be surprising if the BDS movement itself experiences turmoil. For several years now, the UK Palestinian Solidarity Committee (PSC) has conducted a policy of calling leading activists such as Paul Eisen, Gilad Atzmon and Israel Shamir — all Jewish — anti-Semitic for daring to point out that those who persecute Arab Muslims and Christians are not just Zionists but are invariably Jewish. That the Jews who have opted to take Israeli citizenship are increasingly racist, belligerent settlers who use their new identity to dispossess, terrorise and murder Palestinians, with the intent of forcing them to leave even the remaining 12 percent of the land once called Palestine.
These Jews have given Judaism a bad name, causing some “good Jews” to critique their own religious heritage and even disown it, such as American highschooler and winner of the 2012 Martin Luther King Jr Writing Award Jesse Lieberfeld, who came to realise, “I was grouped with the racial supremacists… I was part of a delusion.” For these Jews, Judaism today had been perverted by Zionism. Paying tribute to Jesse, ex-Israeli Gilad Atzmon said, “Journeying from choseness is a life-struggle. From time to time you may feel lonely but you are never alone. Humanity and humanism are there at your side — for all time.” … continue
Blog Roll
-
Join 2,758 other subscribers
Visits Since December 2009
- 6,724,720 hits
Looking for something?
Archives
Calendar
Categories
Aletho News Civil Liberties Corruption Deception Economics Environmentalism Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism Fake News False Flag Terrorism Full Spectrum Dominance Illegal Occupation Mainstream Media, Warmongering Malthusian Ideology, Phony Scarcity Militarism Progressive Hypocrite Russophobia Science and Pseudo-Science Solidarity and Activism Subjugation - Torture Supremacism, Social Darwinism Timeless or most popular Video War Crimes Wars for IsraelTags
9/11 Afghanistan Africa al-Qaeda Australia BBC Benjamin Netanyahu Brazil Canada CDC Central Intelligence Agency China CIA CNN Colombia Covid-19 COVID-19 Vaccine Da’esh Donald Trump Egypt European Union Facebook FBI FDA France Gaza Germany Google Hamas Hebron Hezbollah Hillary Clinton Human rights India Iran Iraq ISIS Israel Israeli settlement Japan Jerusalem Joe Biden Korea Latin America Lebanon Libya Middle East National Security Agency NATO New York Times North Korea NSA Obama Pakistan Palestine Qatar Russia Sanctions against Iran Saudi Arabia Syria The Guardian Turkey Twitter UAE UK Ukraine United Nations United States USA Venezuela Washington Post West Bank WHO Yemen ZionismRecent Comments
peterjohnarnold on Police State Revealed: US Stud… poisonedwater on Iran’s Israel Strike Reshapes… peterjohnarnold on Hungary rejects ‘madness’ of N… peterjohnarnold on How Britain protects ‘Is… Bill Francis on Iran Checkmates US Warmongers,… roberthstiver on Anti-genocide groups are being… peterjohnarnold on Russia Shatters NATO’s Illusor… peterjohnarnold on Report of the Independent Task… peterjohnarnold on Israeli settlers attack Jordan… peterjohnarnold on Israeli truce offer ‘fails to… rediscover911com on Israeli truce offer ‘fails to… rediscover911com on What 10 Years of U.S. Meddling…
Aletho News
- Pandemic Officials are “Disappointed in Themselves”, per the New York Times
- Police State Revealed: US Student Protesters Tracked and Spied Upon
- Starbucks continues to feel weight of global boycott over Gaza war
- Anti-Semitic Awareness Bill Direct Attack on Free Speech
- Legal experts debunk Israeli, US claims challenging ICC jurisdiction
- Inside story of mass graves at Al-Shifa and Al-Nasser hospitals in Gaza
- Yemen expands front against Israel to include Mediterranean Sea
- Iran’s Israel Strike Reshapes West Asia Forever
- Drone hits passenger bus in Russian border region – governor
- How Britain protects ‘Israel’ from war crimes charges: Declassified UK
If Americans Knew
- Israeli cruelty reaches new low; United Methodists divest from Israel – Day 209
- The ‘Antisemitism’ Moral Panic Has Officially Jumped The Shark
- Giraldi: Students Are Taking the Lead in Denouncing Gaza Atrocities
- Commentary: Israel owns our military and Congress via NGO’s FDD & JINSA
- Debris undoubtedly hides booby traps, unexploded ordnance, asbestos – Day 208
- OCTOBER 7—The Lies in Brief
- Palestinian Released From Israeli Prison Describes Beatings, Sexual Abuse and Torture
- Netanyahu’s pledge to attack Rafah; NY Times report questioned again – Day 207
- Report of the Independent Task Force on National Security Memorandum-20 Regarding Israel
- What we are seeing in Gaza is a ‘repeat of Auschwitz,’ says genocide expert
Richie Allen
- The Richie Allen Show Returns Tomorrow Wednesday April 24th
- Call Richie Today Monday March 11th From 4.30pm
- Connect To The Richie Allen Show WhatsApp Today
- NHS Asks Patients To Choose From 12 Genders, 10 sexual Preferences & 159 Religions
- The Richie Allen Show Moves To A New Time Slot From Monday Nov 20th
- Starmer Will Sack Shadow Ministers Who Vote For Gaza Ceasefire
- AI Tool Can Predict Heart Attacks Years In Advance
- Nepal Bans TikTok To Preserve Social Harmony
- Bloke Appointed Boss Of Womb Health Charity
- WHO – “Gaza’s Biggest Hospital Becoming A Cemetery”
No Tricks Zone
- Germany’s Economic Bloodbath Worsens As Green Revolution Causes Economy To Bleed To Death
- Water Vapor Absorbs 84 Times More Radiation Than CO2 … Clouds Drove 89% Of 1982-2018 Warming
- The 97% Consensus Claim Is In Fact 97% Bogus
- Post-1980s Increases In Shortwave Radiation Explains Europe’s Warming Trends Far Better Than CO2
- “A Thing Where Every Part Of Your Life Just Confirms What It Is That You Want To Believe”
- Nature Publication: Researchers Find Arctic Region 10,000 Years Ago Warmer Than Today
- New Study: A Warmer London Has Reduced The Winter Death Toll By 447 Per Year Since 1976
- “New Ice Age Has Begun,” Astrophysicist Warns…Due To Reduced Solar Activity
- 3 Physicists Use Experimental Evidence To Show CO2’s Capacity To Absorb Radiation Has Saturated
- Winter Weather Slams Into Large Parts Of Europe…Madrid Spain Sees Snow!
More Links
Contact:
atheonews (at) gmail.com
Disclaimer
This site is provided as a research and reference tool. Although we make every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and data provided at this site are useful, accurate, and current, we cannot guarantee that the information and data provided here will be error-free. By using this site, you assume all responsibility for and risk arising from your use of and reliance upon the contents of this site.
This site and the information available through it do not, and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Should you require legal advice, you should consult your own attorney.
Nothing within this site or linked to by this site constitutes investment advice or medical advice.
Materials accessible from or added to this site by third parties, such as comments posted, are strictly the responsibility of the third party who added such materials or made them accessible and we neither endorse nor undertake to control, monitor, edit or assume responsibility for any such third-party material.
The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The word “alleged” is deemed to occur before the word “fraud.” Since the rule of law still applies. To peasants, at least.
Fair Use
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
DMCA Contact
This is information for anyone that wishes to challenge our “fair use” of copyrighted material.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe that content residing on or accessible through our website infringes a copyright and falls outside the boundaries of “Fair Use”, please send a notice of infringement by contacting atheonews@gmail.com.
We will respond and take necessary action immediately.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. Aletho News makes no claim of copyright on such material.
[…] Aletho News – December 11, 2009 […]
LikeLike
Pingback by Carbonphobia, the real environmental threat | Dailycensored.com | December 11, 2009 |
Five Things
1) The nation’s forests are in absolute tatters. Death and destruction from benign, nay, malicious neglect enforced by environmentalists has wreaked havoc upon these very ecosystems you deign to protect.
2) Modern harvest techniques can obviate the need for herbicides & pesticides. Selective thinning and mulching can produce a healthier forest than what was found.
3)The forests are already monocrop in many areas because of previous fires.
4) Pop Quiz: Which has greater bio-diversity: A mature forest aged 300 years or a clear cut age 2 years? If you answered a clear cut, you would be correct. Surprised? It’s true. A clear cut allows a greater diversity of species a chance of survival. I by no means advocate clear cuts, just pointing out how education can change the way you look at things.
5) Every stand of timber is different. Every ten acres is different. What works for one area is a disaster 300 feet away. A clear cut mulching and replanting in an area burned over, diseased, or infested with destructive pests is the correct prescription. A selective harvest followed by mulching and grass seeding in an otherwise healthy, heavily stocked stand will leave a healthier, more vigorous forest than what you started with. Every stand is different. The problem is, in most cases, no one bothers to mulch, seed, or replant. It costs too much money. This is called sloughing costs off onto someone else.
LikeLike
Comment by Vermont | December 14, 2009 |
“A clear cut allows a greater diversity of species a chance of survival.”
There is a difference between a high number of different species and an ecosystem. Case in point, the zoo.
“A selective harvest followed by mulching and grass seeding in an otherwise healthy, heavily stocked stand will leave a healthier, more vigorous forest than what you started with.”
The problem is that once you let the harvesters in, the criteria is not healthy forest creation but rather is dictated by economic imperatives. No one can convince us that logging companies are now gardeners.
LikeLike
Comment by aletho | December 14, 2009 |
Go to http://www.tasmaniantimes.com to read about the extremely toxic impact that such a paradigm (agro-forestry) has on the Australian state of Tasmania.
I find it very hard to believe that a 2 year old clearcut results in more biodiversity than a 300 year old native forest. Industry interests don’t hestitate to make these claimes without any references whatsover.
LikeLike
Comment by Brenda Rosser | December 14, 2009 |
I’d much rather burn oil after it has sat underground for millenia doing nothing than the trees I look at that provide home for birds and insects. It’s all carbon. It just goes to show that with enough flowery language and a charismatic speaker, people will agree to anything.
LikeLike
Comment by dan | June 24, 2010 |
It’s called, “The insane running the prison”- I say, “prison.”
We all KNOW tghe absolute importance of trees and plants. BUt tptb are accelerating the thrashing of this Planet. Trees are being cut down faster than ever.
People, have you connected this with your breathing? It’s getting harder and harder to breath! One has to consciously pull in air into the lungs!
LikeLike
Comment by Bonnie | July 28, 2010 |
Grass for feeding indoor living cows is the most effective, economic way to get bio-energy. Grass. Don’t walk on it, smoke it.
LikeLike
Comment by Arne | September 15, 2010 |
[…] Aletho News 11 december 2009 – Carbonphobia, the real environmental threat […]
LikeLike
Pingback by COP15 konspirationsteorier? 180grader redaktør Ole Birk Olesen frygter verdensregering » Balder Blog | June 19, 2011 |
[…] Written by Atheo – Aletho News […]
LikeLike
Pingback by Carbonphobia, The Real Environmental Threat | Sovereign Independent UK | May 15, 2012 |
[…] continue https://alethonews.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/carbonphobia-the-real-environmental-threat/ […]
LikeLike
Pingback by Carbonphobia, the real environmental threat | absenteereality | October 7, 2015 |