Aletho News


Attack of the Cruise Missile Liberals

Margaret Kimberley — Black Agenda Report — 03/30/2011

Liberals Love War

Peace loving Americans are few and far between. The vast majority of our citizens see nothing wrong with their government killing masses of people as long as the rationale sounds high minded and noble.

The love of bloodshed is generally connected with the right wing in this country, but nothing could be further from the truth. The desire for America to dominate the rest of the world is prevalent among most of its citizens, regardless of party affiliation. Those citizens differ only on who they want to see doing the dominating. Republicans are ecstatic when a Republican president drops bombs, sends drones on killing missions or occupies other nations. Democrats are equally enthusiastic when one of their own does the same.

Democratic party reaction to President Obama’s military intervention in Libya is but the latest example of the American propensity to exult over government sponsored violence. Obama, like George W. Bush before him, claims that his intervention, no-fly zone, peace mission (take your pick) is being conducted only for the most humanitarian of purposes. The dead bodies belie the claims of dogooderism but those words have a distinct power for people in this country and will always be used as a pretext for someone dying somewhere on the planet.

The legacy of Manifest Destiny and the belief in white American superiority effects and infects every policy discussion in this nation. The equation of goodness and rightness with white America holds sway very strongly and sadly not just for white people either. The willingness to see white behavior as normative means that foreign policy decisions get a pass precisely at the moment when resistance and skepticism are needed.

No, Barack Obama isn’t white, but he may as well be. He is president precisely because he assured voters that he would not change the complexion of their belief systems. If he didn’t fulfill the deeply ingrained belief that might makes right as long as America, a country thought of as white, is in charge of world affairs, he would never have become the president.

The United States attack on Libya has brought out the worst in this phenomenon. Liberals are gleeful that conservative icon Newt Gingrich backtracked on supporting intervention until the Democratic president actually intervened, but Gingrich is no different than they are.

We now have MSNBC television host Ed Schultz proclaiming “Support for Obama’s Invasion of Libya.” Never mind that Obama has taken great pains to claim that the bombing will be of limited duration and that ground troops will not have a presence there. Schultz seems to be ahead of the president on this one, but his show of support is telling in revealing the true support for American motivations in its interventions abroad. Likewise Juan Cole in an “Open Letter to the Left on Libya” dismisses criticism of the intervention thusly. “I would like to urge the Left to learn to chew gum and walk at the same time,” and adds, “We should avoid making ‘foreign intervention’ an absolute taboo . . .”

Foreign interventions conducted by the United States should be taboo. Our system is not designed to be in any way humanitarian. Its motives are to say the least suspect and no matter how evil its enemies are made out to be, the evidence of past history should make us suspicious of the arguments in favor of war.

The liberal hawks, like Obama, have no concern for Libyan civilians who are enduring bombing, and exposure to depleted uranium shells which create cancers and birth defects for years to come. This is not conjecture, but has been seen in Iraq and ought to be a reason for anyone who claims to be on the “left” to oppose the actions which bring it to pass.

The true anti-war activist, not just anti-Republican activist, has to raise its voice. The true anti-war movement must reawaken itself and hit the streets in the hundreds of thousands, just as they did in 2003 before the invasion of Iraq. That moment can be recreated, and in a deeper, more honest way, now that a Democrat is the head killer in charge.


Margaret Kimberley’s Freedom Rider column appears weekly in BAR, and is widely reprinted elsewhere. She maintains a frequently updated blog as well as at Ms. Kimberley lives in New York City, and can be reached via e-Mail at Margaret.Kimberley(at)

March 30, 2011 - Posted by | Militarism, Progressive Hypocrite, Solidarity and Activism


  1. If someone believes the official 911 story, they will be scared of other attacks, want protection, and that is what has happened.

    911 is the excuse, and a total lie, well picked-apart on multiple levels many times over again.

    That that away, and all orders to go to war are UNLAWFUL ORDERS, meaning they are to be rejected by the military completely.

    An anti-war protest, teach-in, or just tabling someplace, have to make the connections, use photos, especially of the Global Hawk painted at American Air flight 77 that is imitated by the drone Global Hawk, and everything adds up to the psyop it was.:

    Comment by Bill Mitchell | March 30, 2011

  2. I have to believe that the average American is led to believe at an early age that they’re fully knowledgeable when they’re not. When you bring up the fact that the Viet Nam war devalued their dollar and thus their life savings, they’re lost. Other wars will have the same effect. Right away when I type this, the average American would say “I’m not Homer Simpson so how can I be considered dim?” They wouldn’t get it that by the standards of other English speaking nations, Homer Simpson would be considered Down’s Syndrome territory. However, you should never stop pointing out the illogic of some of the outright feces they’re forcefed, like the razzledazzle that’s currently being applied to the subject of nukes in Japan.

    Comment by Eric Vaughan | March 31, 2011

  3. Juan Cole is a fucking “moderate” militarist. He just demonstrate how unreasonably clueless the reasonable can be. The US government and its military has zero moral authority to get involved in any sort of military interventions. Until we have cleaned up our military and held people accountable for the evils done, we have no business even considering such humanitarian adventures. (And we should be in no hurry to ever resume them.) And naturally, as more facts come out about what how this war is being prosecuted and who the Libyan “rebels” are, it all fits the usual picture of US imperialist engagement. Why wouldn’t it?

    Comment by Rudy | March 31, 2011

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.