Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

New War in the Middle East? – Washington Is Dancing To the Tune Being Played by Israel

By Philip Giraldi | American Herald Tribune | February 12, 2018

How many Americans are aware that every two years the United States military engages in large scale exercises with the Israeli Defense Forces that simulate wars against Israel’s neighbors? Three thousand American soldiers are in Israel right now involved in maneuvers that are focused on countering a missile attack from Lebanon. When the exercise, known as Juniper Cobra, was run in 2016 the U.S. commander Lt. Gen. Timothy Ray, who appeared to confuse American national security with that of a small Middle Eastern state, described it as the European Command’s “highest priority” drill that year. He then added that “this exercise increases our military readiness, but just as importantly it also signals our resolve to support Israel.”

Ironically, Lebanon has an army of its own that is in part financially and logistically supported by Washington, though not at the level that the U.S. supports Israel, which means that the U.S. is participating in war games that pit one friendly country and military aid recipient against another. Israel has warned that in any future conflict it will target the Lebanese Army equally with Hezbollah as both are “enemies.”

The truly most interesting aspects of the current exercises in Israel is that the United States has never had any formal alliance with Israel and has absolutely no national interest in becoming involved in Israel’s wars at all. The assumption that the U.S. might be called upon to help defend Israel is not based on any strategic reality, which is not to say it might not happen if Congress and the White House have their way, but it would likely be a double war of aggression, with Israel attacking the militarily much weaker Lebanese followed by the United States weighing in to finish the job after Hezbollah tries to fight back with its batteries of rockets.

That Washington is the Israeli poodle in the current situation is made clear by the recent opening of the first U.S. military base in Israel. It is described as a base within a base as it is completely contained by an Israeli air force installation and operates “under Israeli military directives.” It has no function in support of U.S. regional interests but is instead a shell headquarters with limited support facilities that can be ramped up considerably if Israel goes to war and calls for American assistance. Together with billions of dollars-worth of U.S. military equipment that is pre-positioned in Israel and can be used by the Israelis as needed, it is all about supporting Israeli war-making and has nothing to do with American security or defense interests.

Maneuvers are supposed to simulate possible future military actions, bloodless battles that provide lessons learned for future engagements, suggesting that some genius in the Pentagon who initiated these biennial exercises under George W. Bush, expects American soldiers to assist in the Israeli mission to remake the Middle East in their favor. Pentagon number two Paul Wolfowitz, who had an unseemly close relationship with Israeli military visitors, comes to mind as a possible candidate.

Israel has actually been planning to invade Lebanon. Last September it held its largest military exercise in over twenty years around the theme of a ground invasion of Lebanon. Israeli soldiers even dressed as Hezbollah militiamen as part of the training. There have been repeated warnings by Israeli government officials that there are several red lines that will bring about an Israeli attack, to include evidence that Iran is aiding the development of sophisticated “missile plants” in either Lebanon or Syria. The evidence for such plants is otherwise reported to be apocryphal or perhaps even fabricated, known only to Israeli intelligence, but they should perhaps be seen as a pretext for war and not necessarily based on fact.

Apart from having no compelling interest to get involved in the latest round of bloodletting, the U.S. would be well advised to keep its distance from Benjamin Netanyahu’s schemes to destroy Hezbollah’s power as crushing Lebanon would produce the same kind of regional catastrophe as did the U.S. led Iraq invasion of 2003. Israel’s Minister of Transportation Ysrael Katz recently warned that Lebanon will be “razed to the ground” and “returned to the stone age” if Hezbollah proves able and willing to fire any missiles at Israel.

Israel is itching for a fight and working hard to get Washington involved, not a difficult task given the belligerent proclivities of those who gather to discuss national security strategy in the White House. Viewing Israel’s recent actions relating to Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, it is clear that Netanyahu’s government is the aggressor and is both willing and able to destabilize the entire region without any regard for what happens next. It has already warned that its expected conflict with Lebanon will also involve Syria and that the ultimate target is to eliminate Iranian influence in the area.

Bombings of neighboring Syria by Israeli aircraft have also intensified, leading to the shooting down of an Israeli jet by Syrian air defense forces. The U.S. media covered the story but largely ignored the fact that Netanyahu has launched hundreds of airstrikes against a country with which it is not at war, again using the false claim that Israel is acting defensively and it is Iran that is doing the “interfering.” Of course, the United States in Syria has done much the same thing, lying about developments before setting up an ambush last week that killed 100 Syrian soldiers.

That Washington is dancing to the tune being played by Israel to dismember the Middle East makes the American government an accomplice when the war actually does break out. And it will undoubtedly also have to do much of the fighting. That the United States appears to be committed to defend Israel, even if Israel starts the war, is deplorable and is particularly so as there is no reciprocity. Israel has never fought side-by-side with the United States and if Washington actually finds itself in a situation where it needs Israeli military assistance or support don’t count on it.

*(Juniper Cobra 2016. Image credit: Israel Defense Forces/ flickr)

February 12, 2018 - Posted by | Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism, Militarism, Timeless or most popular, Wars for Israel | , , , ,

6 Comments »

  1. How ’bout those US and Zioentity flags juxtaposed (“entangled,” if you know what I mean)?

    I fear (for the Lebanese, Syrians, Iranis, and always for the Palestinians) that Phil Giraldi will prove all too prescient in his always-spot-on analysis. Gratitude to him, the American Herald Tribune, and Aletho News; will any other media source/outlet pick up this significant geopolitical tour de force?)

    Comment by roberthstiver | February 12, 2018 | Reply

    • Israel loves to show the Star Spangled Banner, mingled with Israel flags, as if they are one and the same. Israel has even convinced someone to paint AIR FORCE ONE in Israel’s colours….and no one seems to have noticed.

      Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | February 13, 2018 | Reply

  2. With a bit of luck, the Zios will decide that the destruction of Tel Aviv and all other major cities is too high a price to pay.

    Comment by traducteur | February 12, 2018 | Reply

    • If that happens, the USA will pay for the reconstruction. You’re already giving them over $3,000,000,000(3Billion dollars)every year…..WHY?(Oh! I know……Someone has to supply the Israeli Lobbyists with the funds to bribe the Congress)……..

      Comment by Brian Harry, Australia | February 13, 2018 | Reply

  3. This is an excellent article by Giraldi. Previously on this website I have criticized Giraldi for not 100% ‘calling a spade a spade’. But now I realize that, although he probably wants to do that, something is preventing him.

    What do I mean? Once again, Giraldi wrote, ” … crushing Lebanon would produce the same kind of regional catastrophe as did the U.S. led Iraq invasion of 2003″ instead of actually coming straight out and writing that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was an INTERNATIONAL WAR CRIME. Specifically, aggressive warfare is an international war crime, recognized as such by the United Nations.

    In the case of this article, which was published by the American Herald Tribune, it is probably the case that this publishing house would be in legal trouble in the US if it allowed a statement that the US had committed a war crime to be published.

    I do sense that Giraldi really would like to write that but he has to pull his punches.

    Comment by I Speak | February 13, 2018 | Reply

    • You do have a point.

      At least what Giraldi does say is spot on.

      One can wish he would say more, but I could place that claim even against I Speak. Where are the articles on US war crimes? Aletho News does take submissions. For the moment one can denounce criminality in the US and survive. Few rise to the challenge.

      But omission is a form of deception at the same time.

      Where to draw the line?

      Comment by aletho | February 13, 2018 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s