Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

Decades of Political Tyranny at the IRS

By Karl Grossman | May 16, 2013

President Barack Obama got it right and wrong Monday when he stated, “If you’ve got the IRS operating in anything less than a neutral and nonpartisan way, then that is outrageous, it is contrary to our traditions.”

He was right in declaring it was “outrageous” for the IRS to target conservative organizations for tough tax treatment. But he was incorrect in saying “it is contrary to our traditions.”

For the U.S. Internal Revenue Service has for decades gone after organizations and individuals that take stands in conflict with the federal government at the time. This has been a tradition, an outrageous tradition.

It is exposed in detail by David Burnham, longtime New York Times investigative reporter, in his 1991 book A Law Unto Itself: The IRS and the Abuse of Power. He relates how President Franklin D. Roosevelt likely “set the stage for the use of the tax agency for political purposes by most subsequent presidents.” Burnham writes about how a former U.S. Treasury Secretary, banker Andrew Mellon, was a special IRS target under FDR. During the presidencies of Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon, he recounts, the focus of the IRS’s efforts “at political control” were civil rights organizations and those against the U.S. engaging in the Vietnam War. Nixon’s “enemies list” and his scheme to use the IRS against those on it is what the current IRS scandal is being most compared.

History Professor John A. Andrew III in his 2002 book Power to Destroy: The Political Uses of the IRS from Kennedy to Nixon—its title drawn from U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s  dictum “The power to tax is the power to destroy”—focuses further on this tradition. He tells of how John F. Kennedy administration’s “Ideological Organizations Project” investigated, intimidated and challenged the tax-exempt status of right-wing groups including the John Birch Society. Then, with a turn of the White House to the right with Nixon came investigations, he writes, of such entities as the Jerry Rubin Foundation, the Fund for Investigative Journalism and the Center for Corporate Responsibility.

During the Reagan administration, I had my own experience with the IRS—ostensibly

because of a book I wrote. Nicaragua: America’s New Vietnam? involved reporting from what was then a war zone in Nicaragua and in Florida—where I interviewed leaders of the contras who were working with the CIA to overthrow Nicaragua’s Sandinista government—and Honduras, being set up as a tarmac for U.S. intervention in Nicaragua. I visited a U.S. military base there. The book warned against a U.S. invasion of Nicaragua (subsequently decided against by the Reagan White House after the Iran-contra scandal). The book was published in 1985 and soon afterwards I was hit with an IRS audit. It would be more, I was informed, than my showing up at an IRS office. The IRS was to come to my house for a “field audit.”

The investigator sat on one side of our dining room table and on the other side was me and my accountant, Peter Berger of Shelter Island. What would be an all-day event started with the investigator asking me to detail how much my family spent on food each week and then, slowly, methodically, going through other expenses. Then he went through income. He obviously was seeking to determine on this fishing expedition whether income exceeded expenses. He went through receipts for business expenses including restaurant receipts, asking who I ate with. He sorted through receipts for office supplies. By mid-afternoon, he had gotten nowhere. At that point, having been hours together, a somewhat weird relationship had been formed. And he began to tell me how his dream in college was to become a journalist. He expanded on that, and then asked: “Have you ever faced retaliation?”

“What do you think this is?” I responded.

He was taken back—insisting my name had come up “at random.”

In the end, all he did was trim some of what was listed as business use of my home phone.

Was I being retaliated against for the book I had written?  One would never know. Recently, I ran into accountant Berger, now retired, and he commented about how that day at my house was the strangest IRS audit he had ever been involved in.

The IRS has been beyond reform. Burnham writes in A Law Unto Itself: The IRS and the Abuse of Power that a “political imperative of not messing with the IRS” has become “close to being a law of nature almost as unbending as the force of gravity.”  It is “rarely examined by Congress.”

President Obama announced yesterday that the acting commissioner of the IRS was asked and agreed to tender his resignation as a result of the scandal. That’s a small start. Far more important is somehow ending the tradition of IRS political tyranny. Fundamental change in the IRS is called for.

Karl Grossman, professor of journalism at the State University of New York/College of New York, is the author of the book, The Wrong Stuff: The Space’s Program’s Nuclear Threat to Our Planet. Grossman is an associate of the media watch group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR).

Source

May 16, 2013 - Posted by | "Hope and Change", Civil Liberties, Full Spectrum Dominance | , , , ,

3 Comments »

  1. it is a manifestation of the BAD FAITH TALMUDIC TERRORIST so-called “Jews”…

    http://www.israelect.com/reference/Willie-Martin/KnowEnemy.html

    Federal Reserve…Idiots Representing Satan…From Gordon Kahl to Arron Russo the victims of these economic terrorists are too numerous to list just like the 300 million Victims of Zionism/Bolshevism/Communism…..the “Jewishness” needs to be removed!

    http://www.masada2000.org/list-A.html

    this YIDDISH THEATRE….production is about to go NUCLEAR….

    Comment by Anthony Clifton | May 17, 2013 | Reply

  2. Since by its own admission, the IRS is literally a debt collection agency, for them to be targeting anybody who doesn’t owe a debt that they can legally collect on is an outrage. And I want to make this perfectly clear: Title 26 of the US Code, which has never been enacted into statutory law, has nothing to do with the IRS. It only applies to the Department of Internal Revenue, which is a US government agency. Title 26 doesn’t authorize the IRS to enforce any part of it. The IRS is a private, for-profit debt collection agency, and thus comes under Title 15, which deals with collection practices. Thus, anybody who wants to sue the IRS should NEVER make the mistake of hauling ANY part of Title 26 into the mess. The specific thing that you want to club the IRS in the head with is Title 15, Chapter 41, Subchapter 5, Subsection 1692.

    One more thing. Stop calling this slimy Criminal-in-Chief of a federal corporation “President.” It makes me want to puke.

    Comment by Big M | May 17, 2013 | Reply

  3. Entire agency is unconstitutional, never been ratified. Its sponsoring agency, the Fed passed into law by 5 Congressmen on zionist payroll on Xmas Eve, instituted it ti be the collection arm for Fed Reserve- to pay for decades of wars, and provide an unlimited sluch fund to Rothschild & the zio-Cabal. Abolish this illegal mugging of America. Refuse to pay!

    Comment by rr5 | May 18, 2013 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 647 other followers