Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

WHY IS THE ISRAEL LOBBY KEEPING QUIET ON SYRIA CRISIS?

By Damian Lataan | August 29, 2013

In a recent article in Politico, Anna Palmer pondered the question of why the Israel lobby is silent on Syria. After having spoken with a number of pro-Israel activists representing pro-Israeli organisations like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the American Jewish Committee (AJC) she reports that most have kept quiet about the events in Syria for two main reasons: one is the uncertainty of what is going on in Syria and, two, not wanting to seem in any way influential about US foreign policy relating to affairs in the Middle East – especially after the disastrous invasion of Iraq which was strongly supported by most Israeli lobby groups on the basis that Saddam supported the Palestinian cause during the Second Intifada and had WMDs likely to be used against Israel.

Meanwhile, at Commentary online magazine, lead neocon propagandist Jonathan Tobin attempts to spin that the pro-Israeli groups in the US, better known as the Israel Lobby (‘so-called’ as Tobin would have it), don’t have a vested interest in the outcome of the Syrian war because, regardless of who wins, it will not, he says, be in Israel’s interests. He denies that the pro-Israeli organisations are not trying to keep a low profile for any nefarious reasons that they could take advantage of or that they are worried about public opinion if they supported intervention against al-Assad.

The reality, which Palmer has ignored and which Tobin would vehemently deny, is that the Israeli Zionists, including the neocons and those in AIPAC, the AJC and the other pro-Israeli organisations are hoping that the war in Syria where al-Assad is supported by Hezbollah and Iran, will spill out into Lebanon which will then provide Israel with an opportunity to attack Hezbollah. Further escalation may then even involve an attack against Iran by either Israel and/or the US.

Israel will play its usual game of provocation such as IDF incursions into Lebanon, drone flights over Lebanon, low level strike jet overflights into Lebanese airspace, shootings of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, etc., in the hope of provoking retaliation from the Palestinians and Hezbollah that would justify a full on attack against both. A US and allied attack against Syria might also provoke retaliatory attacks against Israel that would also justify Israeli action.

But, of course, none of this is likely to be talked about openly by Zionist Israelis or their representative Israel Lobby organisations are they? Hence the silence.

August 29, 2013 - Posted by | Deception, Wars for Israel | , , , , , , ,

2 Comments »

  1. didn’t realize the non stop mouths were somewhat quiet.

    if true, because they are guilty.

    Israel terrified of hezbullah.

    they count on u.s. also turning to lebanon. then iran.

    Like

    Comment by 5 dancing shlomos | August 29, 2013 | Reply

  2. the zio-cons are mum because they have given the syria obliteration initiative sufficient media impetus to take the baby carriage over the cliff and though they are the principle beneficiaries, they want to distance themselves a bit from the murderous results and let the US military take the blame for the enormity of civilian casualties planned in order to open Syria for ethnic cleansing and re-colonization. The tasks ahead will completely undermine the US military willingness to make war against urban civilians and will reprise Fallujah on a larger scale but with vastly more US casualties. After Damascus, civilian murders in combat will become the exclusive preserve of Wahhabi / Salafist / Takfiri mercenaries again to distance Americans from vicarious guilt that their lifestyle, blood-lust and cost in suffering is not negotiable. The question is not whether but when will the USA lose its stomach for more Zio-con wars. M\\

    Like

    Comment by Michael\\ | August 29, 2013 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.